1Jan

Ragtime Summary Arakin

Ragtime Summary Arakin Rating: 3,9/5 3557 votes

The text under analysis is written by an outstanding British novelist and short story writer Hector Munro. Hector Hugh Munro (, ', ', better nown by the *ai, was a writer, whose witty and sometimes stories satiri+ed society and culture. He is considered a master o- the and is o-ten com)ared to. His tales -eature delicately drawn characters and -inely 0udged narratives. *ais world contrasts the e--ete conventions and hy)ocrisies o- dwardian ngland with the ruthless but straight-orward li-e2and2death struggles o- nature. #ature generally wins in the end. The text tells us a story about a small boy #icholas, who was brought u) by his tyrannical and ungoverned aunt 3ugusta.

He was 4in disgrace4 as he had re-used to eat his wholesome bread2and2 mil that morning. 5hen children were taen to 6ag borough sands #icholas made some attem)ts to get into the gooseberry garden. 3s a matter o- -act, he had no intention o- trying to get into the gooseberry garden, but it was extremely convenient -or him that his aunt should believe that he had unsym)athetic.

*oon his aunt tried to loo -or the boy and sli))ed into the rain2water tan. *he ased #icholas to -etch a ladder but the boy )retended not to understand her, he said that she was the vil ne. 3-ter this accident they both e)t silent and everyone has been shi))ed in their thoughts. The ind o- the story is the narration, in that story we see descri)tion o- one lumber room. 7n the story we meet #icholas, the boy who have a big imagination .

Splinter cell blacklist activation code crack. 9 The climax o- the text. 5hile the boy was admiring the colouring o- a mandarin duc, the voice o- his aunt came -rom the gooseberry garden.

*he got sli))ed into the rain2water tan and couldn:t go out. *he demanded -rom the boy to bring her a ladder, but he said her voice didn:t sound lie his aunt:s.; ou may be the vil ne tem)ting me to b e disobedient.

S Day Diet Summary. Juliana Morales Morales Page 1 of 3 Writing Skills 040-QA Intro, Summary & Response, Conclusion Final Draft Professor Kay Rudeness at the Movies On average, most Americans go out to public places to eat and for activities. Arakin 3 Key. Gerund and Present Participle. Literary Analysis Ragtime. Use of Audio Visual Aids. Give a summary of Text One. Make up and act out a.

6ustice must be done. The 3unt tasted the -ruit o- her own )unishment on the children. *he is accused o- -alling -rom grace, o- lying to #icholas about 0am and thus termed the vil ne.

*he -eels what it is lie to be condemned. The denouncement. The 3unt is -urious and en-orces in the house. *he maintained the -ro+en muteness o- one who has su--ered undigni-ied and unmerited detention in a rain2water tan -or thirty2-ive minutes.

#icholas was also silent, in the absor)tion o- an enchanting )icture o- a hunter and a stag. The ending o- the story reveals the author:s social comment about the di--erences between the world o- the child and adult. Though the 3unt is -urious, #icholas is thining about the hunter tricing the hounds by using the stag as a bait. 7t is a re)resentative o- his own li-e, he is lie a hunter able to.

Alex Chudinovskih ED-09-412 Analysis of “Ragtime” by E.L.Doctorow. The author, E.L. Doctorow, an American writer, is famous for his novels which include “Welcome to Hard Times” and “The book of Daniel” which was nominated for a national Book Award. The story “Ragtime” is written in the third person narration. The narrator is omniscient and unobtrusive as he doesn’t interfere and doesn’t show his opinion.

The setting is dynamic and it is given explicitly. We may see that the action takes place in United States of America as such words as “New York”, “Manhattan” are mentioned. The time covers few weeks.

We may also guess the season. By the words “a bouquet of yellow chrysanthemums which in this season had to have cost him a pretty penny” we may say that it was a cold time of the year, may be it was winter.

But this information is given implicitly. So the composition consists of exposition, complication, climax and denouement. The exposition gives us information about Coalhouse Walker, but this information scatters all throughout the extract. The complication gives us information about the situation referring to Coalhouse Walker and Sarah. The complication gives us information about the situation referring to Sarah and Coalhouse Walker. As for me the climax of the story is silence after Coalhouse Walker’s playing: “There was another silence”, the narrator says.

This moment is the most tense. The last sentences form the denouement and so we come to know that Sarah didn’t appear in front of Coalhouse Walker. Having read the extract we may point out the following conflicts: the external conflict, between Sarah and the comer, and the internal conflict, inside Sarah, in her heart and soul. On the one hand, Sarah loves Coalhouse Walker, on the other hand she can’t forgive him and she suffers because of it.